General Criteria for Assessment24 May 2013Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority

General Criteria for Assessment

Along with meeting priority actions and locations in the Priorities Documents and sub-strategies, the following criteria are also considered when aligning projects with fund sources and other constraints.

  1. Is there alignment between the problem to be addressed and the regional or state priorities?
  2. Is the proposed action relevant to addressing the threat?
  3. Is the proposal technically sound?
  4. Are the costs realistic costs? For example $/ha  of revegetation, $/km of fencing.
  5. Capacity to deliver – does the project ensure the appropriate skills, resources and technical knowledge will be available? This will include consideration of past performance.
  6. Is there demonstrated support from relevant agency,  partners, community groups.
  7. Cost share. Most projects need at least matching funds in-kind or cash from proponents to be considered an attractive investment by funders.